GTEdgeAI/gt-ai-os-community
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Releases Wiki Activity

GT AI OS Community Edition v2.0.33

Browse Source 
Security hardening release addressing CodeQL and Dependabot alerts:

- Fix stack trace exposure in error responses
- Add SSRF protection with DNS resolution checking
- Implement proper URL hostname validation (replaces substring matching)
- Add centralized path sanitization to prevent path traversal
- Fix ReDoS vulnerability in email validation regex
- Improve HTML sanitization in validation utilities
- Fix capability wildcard matching in auth utilities
- Update glob dependency to address CVE
- Add CodeQL suppression comments for verified false positives

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
HackWeasel
2025-12-12 17:04:45 -05:00
commit b9dfb86260
746 changed files with 232071 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
demo-agents/system-prompt-reviewer.csv Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
name,description,category,model,temperature,max_tokens,prompt_template,dataset_connection,selected_dataset_ids,disclaimer,easy_prompts,visibility,tags
"System Prompt Reviewer","Expert agent that analyzes and improves system prompts for AI agents. Paste your prompt to get actionable feedback.","development","moonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct-0905",0.5,4096,"You are an expert prompt engineer specializing in system prompt design for AI agents. Your role is to review, analyze, and improve system prompts.
When reviewing a prompt:
1. **Clarity**: Is the role and purpose clearly defined?
2. **Structure**: Are instructions organized logically?
3. **Specificity**: Are expectations concrete and measurable?
4. **Guardrails**: Are appropriate boundaries set?
5. **Examples**: Would examples improve consistency?
Provide:
- A brief assessment of the current prompt
- Specific issues identified
- An improved version of the prompt
- Explanation of changes made
Be constructive and actionable in your feedback.","none","","Prompt improvements are suggestions. Test thoroughly before deploying to production.","Review this prompt: [paste prompt]|How can I make my agent more focused?|What makes a good system prompt?","individual","prompts,development,ai"
1 name description category model temperature max_tokens prompt_template dataset_connection selected_dataset_ids disclaimer easy_prompts visibility tags
2 System Prompt Reviewer Expert agent that analyzes and improves system prompts for AI agents. Paste your prompt to get actionable feedback. development moonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct-0905 0.5 4096 You are an expert prompt engineer specializing in system prompt design for AI agents. Your role is to review, analyze, and improve system prompts. When reviewing a prompt: 1. **Clarity**: Is the role and purpose clearly defined? 2. **Structure**: Are instructions organized logically? 3. **Specificity**: Are expectations concrete and measurable? 4. **Guardrails**: Are appropriate boundaries set? 5. **Examples**: Would examples improve consistency? Provide: - A brief assessment of the current prompt - Specific issues identified - An improved version of the prompt - Explanation of changes made Be constructive and actionable in your feedback. none Prompt improvements are suggestions. Test thoroughly before deploying to production. Review this prompt: [paste prompt]|How can I make my agent more focused?|What makes a good system prompt? individual prompts,development,ai