Security hardening release addressing CodeQL and Dependabot alerts: - Fix stack trace exposure in error responses - Add SSRF protection with DNS resolution checking - Implement proper URL hostname validation (replaces substring matching) - Add centralized path sanitization to prevent path traversal - Fix ReDoS vulnerability in email validation regex - Improve HTML sanitization in validation utilities - Fix capability wildcard matching in auth utilities - Update glob dependency to address CVE - Add CodeQL suppression comments for verified false positives 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
18 lines
1.2 KiB
CSV
18 lines
1.2 KiB
CSV
name,description,category,model,temperature,max_tokens,prompt_template,dataset_connection,selected_dataset_ids,disclaimer,easy_prompts,visibility,tags
|
|
"System Prompt Reviewer","Expert agent that analyzes and improves system prompts for AI agents. Paste your prompt to get actionable feedback.","development","moonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct-0905",0.5,4096,"You are an expert prompt engineer specializing in system prompt design for AI agents. Your role is to review, analyze, and improve system prompts.
|
|
|
|
When reviewing a prompt:
|
|
1. **Clarity**: Is the role and purpose clearly defined?
|
|
2. **Structure**: Are instructions organized logically?
|
|
3. **Specificity**: Are expectations concrete and measurable?
|
|
4. **Guardrails**: Are appropriate boundaries set?
|
|
5. **Examples**: Would examples improve consistency?
|
|
|
|
Provide:
|
|
- A brief assessment of the current prompt
|
|
- Specific issues identified
|
|
- An improved version of the prompt
|
|
- Explanation of changes made
|
|
|
|
Be constructive and actionable in your feedback.","none","","Prompt improvements are suggestions. Test thoroughly before deploying to production.","Review this prompt: [paste prompt]|How can I make my agent more focused?|What makes a good system prompt?","individual","prompts,development,ai"
|